The intricate relationship between Pakistan and Afghanistan is not a mere border dispute but a deeply entrenched, multi-layered structural conflict that is simultaneously historical, ethnic, and geopolitical. This crisis has intensified dramatically since the Taliban’s return to power in Kabul in 2021, transforming a decades-long rivalry into a critical security and humanitarian emergency.
The core issue fueling this perennial conflict is the Durand Line, the 2,640-kilometer colonial-era demarcation established in 1893. Afghanistan has consistently never formally recognized this boundary, viewing it as an unjust, foreign imposition. This non-recognition sustains a profound ideological and ethnic friction because the line arbitrarily bisects the ancestral homeland of the Pashtun ethnic group. This feeds into Pashtun irredentism, leading various Afghan governments to historically claim large territories within Pakistan. For Islamabad, the sanctity of this border is an existential pillar of its territorial integrity. This situation results in a heavily militarized, yet chronically porous, frontier that facilitates the constant, uncontrolled movement of populations, goods, and, critically, militant groups.
For decades, Pakistan’s strategic approach was defined by the quest for “strategic depth” against India, which involved actively supporting and cultivating the Afghan Taliban. This strategy relied on the notion that a friendly government in Kabul would secure its western flank. The Taliban’s swift takeover in August 2021 was initially hailed by Pakistan’s security establishment as a historic victory. However, this proved to be a catastrophic strategic error, resulting in severe blowback. The new Taliban regime provided a secure, deep sanctuary for its ideological counterpart, the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), or the Pakistani Taliban. Operating freely from Afghan soil, the TTP initiated a dramatic surge in sophisticated terrorist attacks inside Pakistan, primarily targeting security forces and reversing years of counter-terrorism gains. Islamabad now openly accuses the Afghan Taliban leadership despite their past alliance of actively aiding or passively tolerating the TTP’s operations. The Afghan Taliban, driven by an increased sense of national sovereignty and a shared Pashtun identity with the TTP, has proven unwilling or unable to take decisive action. This has led to the near-total collapse of the decades-long alliance and elevated the TTP threat to the single greatest internal security challenge facing Pakistan today.
The complex security confrontation is compounded by escalating humanitarian and economic crises. The conflict has moved beyond political rivalry, characterized since 2023 by frequent, deadly cross-border artillery and rocket exchanges. This culminated in Pakistan’s unprecedented airstrikes deep inside Afghan territory to target TTP hideouts, a dangerous escalation that pushed tensions to a military breaking point. Simultaneously, Pakistan has weaponized its sovereign control over its borders by initiating a controversial and large-scale campaign since late 2023 to forcibly repatriate over a million undocumented Afghan refugees. While justified on grounds of national security and economic strain, this move is widely interpreted as a primary coercive lever aimed at pressing the Taliban government into eliminating the TTP threat. This policy has generated a massive and urgent humanitarian crisis for the returning population. Compounding this, the recurring, unpredictable closure of vital border crossings, particularly Torkham and Chaman, disrupts the crucial transit trade lifeline that landlocked Afghanistan depends on. While intended as a tool of political pressure, this economic warfare simultaneously harms both Afghan and Pakistani traders, spikes regional inflation, and further deepens the humanitarian catastrophe in Afghanistan.
From my personal experience working on the ground in Kabul, it was clear how deeply entrenched these dynamics are; the macro-level decisions at the border instantly translated into micro-level hardship and uncertainty. I observed firsthand how this border tension directly translated into instability, affecting everything from aid delivery logistics to the daily fears of local populations. As one Afghan colleague working on displaced persons programs shared with me, “For the leaders, this border is a line on a map that separates two capitals; but for us, it is a wall built right through the middle of our family and our ability to survive.”
In stark contrast to this fraught relationship, Afghanistan’s historical and cultural ties with India stand as a powerful counter-narrative of cooperation and goodwill. India has consistently positioned itself as a non-intrusive developmental partner for the Afghan people, focusing heavily on infrastructure, capacity building, and humanitarian aid. Major Indian-funded projects, such as the construction of the Afghan Parliament building in Kabul, the Afghan-India Friendship Dam (Salma Dam) in Herat, and the Zaranj-Delaram highway, represent significant investments aimed at improving Afghan sovereignty and economic connectivity. Furthermore, India has historically offered extensive scholarships to Afghan students and provided substantial humanitarian assistance, including food grains and medical supplies, demonstrating a relationship rooted in deep-seated cultural linkages and people-to-people contact that dates back centuries. This supportive role contrasts sharply with the geopolitical rivalry defining Pakistan-Afghanistan ties, providing Afghanistan with a crucial strategic and economic counterbalance.
The escalating Pakistan-Afghanistan conflict fundamentally impacts the lives of millions and the broader regional peace and economy. For the ordinary people, this friction translates directly into human insecurity and despair. In Pakistan, the surge in TTP attacks forces the displacement of families from border regions and imposes a chilling effect on commerce and investment due to heightened risk. Simultaneously, the forced repatriation subjects returning Afghan refugees to homelessness, poverty, and a complete loss of livelihood, overwhelming Afghanistan’s non-existent social infrastructure. This creates a massive, vulnerable population pool that risks being exploited by extremist groups, creating a vicious cycle of instability. The impact on regional peace is equally corrosive. The frequent military exchanges and airstrikes across the Durand Line raise the specter of a broader, low-intensity conflict between two nuclear-armed states. Economically, the recurring border closures and escalating security threats act as a severe brake on growth for both countries, disrupting Afghanistan’s vital trade lifeline and draining Pakistan’s national budget through continuous counter-terrorism operations, ensuring that neither nation can achieve sustainable prosperity.
Leave a Reply